![]() |
| Conservative Councillor Rob Harwood Photo: Southampton City Council |
A former senior Council officer who left his role and in the next year became a Conservative Councillor at the same Council, has now cost Southampton City Council more than £25,000 in costs for an investigation into him.
If Councillor Harwood had been more careful with his words, the Council could have spent this on services instead.
Rob Harwood's name appeared on reports for decision at the Council by councillors, up to 2017. These included two reports relating to the Council's deal with Balfour Beatty for the Highways Service Partnership.
One report had his name on it in 2010 when the Tory-controlled Council signed the original deal. And Harwood's name was at the top of another report in 2017 on the same subject.
In 2018, Harwood was elected as a Conservative councillor for Bitterne Park ward.
In 2022, he lost his seat, being defeated by Tony Bunday, who later quit Labour.
And in 2024, he was elected to a different ward, this time Harefield.
Not that you would know from the Council's website. His current Councillor page does not mention that he had been a Councillor before. It must be an oversight.
Not many months after being elected, Councillor Harwood made some loose comments in the Council Chamber and on LinkedIn.
As reported by Local Government Lawyer and the Daily Echo, these resulted in an investigation into him (and another councillor who was exonerated, so is not named publicly).
He was found to have breached the Code of Conduct.
The internal investigation cost £6,703. The external investigation cost another £18,964 and 31 pence.
This is a total cost of £25,667.31 that had to be found from Council reserves.
If Councillor Harwood had been more careful with his words, the Council could have spent this on services instead.
You would think that he would have learned his lesson.
But it seems not.
Because he has been offensive in his response to questions that Southampton Independents sent him about how he managed any potential conflict of interest in relation to the Balfour Beatty deals, bearing in mind he had been an officer first and a councillor in the next year.
He first ignored our questions. Then when pressed again, after we copied in his Group Leader Peter Baillie, he refused again to answer them, and said our questions were "irrelevant", and that Southampton Independents is "irrelevant".
Our questions are very relevant, because the Tories signed the deal and Labour extended it. We hold them to account for their failures.
They did the deal and extended it at taxpayers expense, despite the failures of the deal in the eyes of the Southampton people.
The people of our City constantly complain about the state of our roads.
Yet neither Labour nor Tory councillors have cancelled the deal with Balfour Beatty.
Labour or Tory, same old story.
Southampton Independents has obtained detailed information about the deal, and this includes how decisions were made in secret without the public being able to see. We are not talking about small amounts of money, either.
We think this lack of transparency is wrong. Do you?
We will be publishing more information when the time is right.
![]() |
| Labour or Tory, same old story. Your money robbed. |

.png)
.png)
























